QSBS Advisor Match

QSBS Excluded Industries: Which Businesses Don't Qualify Under Section 1202?

Not every small business can issue QSBS. Section 1202 excludes a specific set of industries from eligibility. If your company is in one of those categories, your shareholders cannot exclude gain no matter how long they hold their stock — and the analysis isn't always obvious for companies that straddle the line.

What this test determines

To qualify under Section 1202, a corporation must be a "qualified small business," and the stock must have been issued in connection with the active conduct of a "qualified trade or business."1 The qualified-trade-or-business requirement excludes two categories of companies:

Both of these apply at the company level. The question is what the issuing corporation does — not who the investor is, how they use the proceeds, or what the investor's own profession is. A surgeon can hold QSBS in a software startup. A financial advisor can hold QSBS in a restaurant chain. What matters is what the company does.

The active business test (§1202(e)(1)) also requires that at least 80% of company assets be used in a qualified trade or business during substantially all of the holding period. These two requirements interact: if the company is in an excluded field for even a portion of its activities, that portion may count against the 80% threshold.

The §1202(e)(3) excluded-industry list

The statute lists the following as not qualified trades or businesses. All are excluded as of the current law in 2026; the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA, July 2025) did not change which industries are excluded.2

A. Service fields (§1202(e)(3)(A))

Any trade or business involving the performance of services in the following fields is excluded:

FieldStatusCommon examples
HealthExcludedMedical practices, dental practices, optometry, chiropractic, physical therapy, veterinary clinics
LawExcludedLaw firms, solo attorney practices, legal consulting
EngineeringExcludedCivil engineering firms, structural engineering, mechanical engineering consultancies
ArchitectureExcludedArchitectural design firms, landscape architecture
AccountingExcludedCPA firms, tax preparation practices, bookkeeping services
Actuarial scienceExcludedActuarial consulting practices, insurance-risk advisory firms
Performing artsExcludedTalent agencies where artist skill drives value, entertainment management businesses tied to specific performers
ConsultingExcludedManagement consulting, strategy consulting, HR consulting, IT consulting
AthleticsExcludedSports agencies, personal training businesses built on trainer reputation
Financial servicesExcludedInvestment advisory firms, wealth management practices, financial planning firms
Brokerage servicesExcludedSecurities broker-dealers, real estate brokerages, insurance brokerages
Key phrase: "involving the performance of services." The exclusion applies to service businesses — companies where the product delivered to customers is the performance of a service in the excluded field. A company that sells software to law firms is not "involving the performance of services in the field of law." A company that provides legal services is. This distinction matters for a range of technology, healthcare IT, and fintech companies.

B. The reputation-or-skill catch-all (§1202(e)(3)(A))

In addition to the named service fields, Section 1202 excludes any trade or business "where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of 1 or more of its employees."1

This provision is narrower than it sounds. Nearly every business has skilled employees. The IRS and courts have interpreted "principal asset" to mean businesses whose economic value derives primarily from personal reputation — not from products, systems, intellectual property, or processes. A company where a single founder's name or personal brand is the primary reason clients engage the firm is more likely to trigger this catch-all than a company with institutionalized products or customer bases.

C. Banking, insurance, financing, leasing, and investing (§1202(e)(3)(B))

Any trade or business involving banking, insurance, financing, leasing, investing, or "similar business" is excluded. This covers:

Note that the exclusion is for companies in these businesses. A software company that builds banking software, a SaaS company that adds payment processing, or a startup that holds a small investment portfolio as a cash management measure does not automatically become a "financing or investing business."

D. Farming (§1202(e)(3)(C))

Any farming business, including the raising or harvesting of trees, is excluded. Agtech companies that sell technology to farmers are in a different position than operating farms — they sell products, not farming services, and have been treated as potentially qualifying businesses.

E. Resource extraction (§1202(e)(3)(D))

Businesses involved in the production or extraction of products for which a percentage-depletion deduction is allowable (under IRC §§613 and 613A) are excluded. This covers oil and gas, coal, minerals, and certain other natural resources. Clean-energy companies (wind, solar, battery storage) are not in this category unless they also extract depletion-eligible resources.

F. Hotels, motels, and restaurants (§1202(e)(3)(E))

Businesses that operate hotels, motels, restaurants, or "similar businesses" are excluded. "Similar" has generally been interpreted to include other lodging and food-service operations. A technology company whose SaaS platform is sold to hotel operators is not "operating a hotel."

Borderline business types: how the analysis works in practice

The hardest cases arise when a company has some connection to an excluded field but is not a pure service provider in that field. Here are the most common borderline scenarios:

Healthcare technology company

CompanyElectronic health records SaaS platform sold to hospitals and medical practices
Does it qualify?Likely qualifies
ReasoningThe company sells software — it is not "performing services in the field of health." The customers are healthcare providers; the company itself does not treat patients or bill for clinical services. The IRS Chief Counsel has recognized this distinction in several informal positions. However, if the company employs physicians to provide telehealth services or medical director oversight billed to clients, that revenue stream may be excluded and must be analyzed under the 80% active business test.

Fintech / financial technology startup

CompanyApp that automates personal budgeting and savings; does not hold user funds or provide investment advice
Does it qualify?Likely qualifies
ReasoningThe company sells software, not financial services. It does not manage assets, execute trades, or hold licenses as a broker-dealer or investment advisor. Compare to a robo-advisor that is registered as an investment advisor and charges AUM fees — that company is more likely in the "financial services" or "investing" business and would be excluded.

IT consulting and staffing firm

CompanyTechnology staffing agency placing engineers and developers with enterprise clients on a time-and-materials basis
Does it qualify?Likely excluded
ReasoningThe company's business is performing consulting services (placing people to provide technical services to others). "Consulting" is named in §1202(e)(3)(A). The IRS has taken the position that IT consulting falls within the consulting exclusion. Selling software products, by contrast, is not "consulting." The distinction is whether clients are paying for people's time and expertise versus a product or platform.

Software-plus-services company

CompanySaaS platform with 70% revenue from software licenses and 30% from professional services and implementation consulting
Does it qualify?Depends on asset allocation
ReasoningThis is analyzed under the 80% active business test. If 70%+ of company assets are used in the qualified (software) business and the consulting activities fall below the 20% threshold, the company can satisfy the active business test and the stock may qualify. If the consulting business is larger or growing, the company may fail the 80% threshold. Asset allocation — not revenue split — is the statutory measure.

Management consulting firm pivoting to SaaS

CompanyFormer consulting firm that built a software product; at issuance, revenue was 90% consulting / 10% software
Does it qualify?Excluded at issuance
ReasoningThe qualified-trade-or-business test must be met "during substantially all of the taxpayer's holding period." Stock issued when the company was primarily a consulting firm was issued into a disqualified business. Even if the company later pivots to 90% SaaS revenue, the original issuance facts are captured at the time of issuance. Shares issued after the business has demonstrably shifted to a qualifying model would be analyzed based on those later facts.

Real estate startup (proptech)

CompanyOnline real estate marketplace that charges listing fees; does not hold property or perform brokerage transactions
Does it qualify?Likely qualifies
ReasoningOperating a marketplace platform is different from being a real estate brokerage. "Brokerage services" in §1202(e)(3)(A) refers to acting as a licensed agent on behalf of buyers or sellers in transactions. A platform that charges listing fees is closer to a media or technology company. This is fact-specific — if the company employs licensed agents and earns commissions from transactions, it becomes harder to distinguish from a brokerage.

The 80% active business test — how it interacts with excluded industries

Section 1202(e)(1) requires that at least 80% of a corporation's assets (by value) be used in the active conduct of a qualified trade or business during substantially all of the shareholder's holding period.1

This means a company can have some revenue or assets in an excluded category and still have its stock qualify — as long as the excluded activities don't exceed 20% of total assets. The statute measures assets, not revenue. A company can have a high-margin consulting line that represents 30% of revenue but only 10% of total assets (because the consulting business requires little capital) and still pass the test.

Practically:

Practical implication: Founders and investors should revisit the active business test at major inflection points — a new product line, a service-heavy acquisition, a pivot in the business model. Stock that qualified at issuance can fail if the business changes. Ongoing compliance is not automatic.

What OBBBA changed — and what it didn't

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (signed July 4, 2025) made significant changes to Section 1202, but none of them affected the excluded-industry list. The changes under OBBBA are:3

The §1202(e)(3) excluded-industry list is unchanged. A business excluded before OBBBA remains excluded after it.

What to do if your company is in an excluded industry

If your company's primary business is in an excluded field, your stock does not qualify for the §1202 exclusion regardless of holding period. But that's not the end of the planning conversation:

For investors who believed their stock qualified but later discover the company was in an excluded industry, a tax professional should be engaged before any transaction closes — incorrectly reporting excluded gain can result in underpayment penalties and interest.

Working with an advisor on the business eligibility question

The industry-exclusion analysis is a facts-and-circumstances inquiry, not a checkbox. Companies with ambiguous business models — software-plus-services, healthcare technology, fintech, marketplace platforms — need qualified tax counsel to document the analysis before a transaction, not after.

A fee-only financial advisor working with QSBS holders typically helps coordinate:

See the guide to choosing a QSBS advisor and the full qualification requirements guide for more context on what the advisor reviews and when to engage before a transaction.

Talk to a QSBS specialist advisor

If your company's business model is ambiguous or you're not sure whether your shares qualify, a specialist can coordinate the review with your CPA and M&A attorney before a transaction closes. Use the form below.

Fee-only focus - No obligation - Privacy-minded matching - Built for seven-figure planning decisions

Sources

  1. 26 U.S.C. § 1202 — Partial exclusion for gain from certain small business stock (LII/Cornell). §1202(e)(1) (active business test); §1202(e)(3) (qualified trade or business definition and excluded-industry list). Values and structure verified as of June 2026.
  2. IRS Chief Counsel Advice 202418001 (April 2024) — addresses §1202 qualified trade or business analysis for a service-adjacent business.
  3. Grant Thornton — Explaining enhanced Section 1202 benefits (2025). Summary of OBBBA changes to the exclusion cap, tiered holding period, and gross assets threshold. Confirms excluded-industry list is unchanged.
  4. The Tax Adviser — QSBS gets a makeover: What tax pros need to know about Sec. 1202's new look (November 2025). Practitioner analysis of post-OBBBA QSBS planning, including unchanged qualified-trade-or-business requirements.
  5. ACTEC Foundation — Estate Planning Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act: QSBS (2025). Discussion of OBBBA QSBS changes from estate planning and gifting perspective.

Excluded-industry list reflects §1202(e)(3) as amended through June 2026. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21, July 4, 2025) did not amend the §1202(e)(3) excluded-industry list.