QSBS Excluded Industries: Which Businesses Don't Qualify Under Section 1202?
Not every small business can issue QSBS. Section 1202 excludes a specific set of industries from eligibility. If your company is in one of those categories, your shareholders cannot exclude gain no matter how long they hold their stock — and the analysis isn't always obvious for companies that straddle the line.
What this test determines
To qualify under Section 1202, a corporation must be a "qualified small business," and the stock must have been issued in connection with the active conduct of a "qualified trade or business."1 The qualified-trade-or-business requirement excludes two categories of companies:
- Excluded service fields — companies that perform services in enumerated professional fields, or where the principal asset is employee reputation or skill
- Other excluded activities — banking, insurance, financing, investing, farming, resource extraction, and hotel/restaurant operation
Both of these apply at the company level. The question is what the issuing corporation does — not who the investor is, how they use the proceeds, or what the investor's own profession is. A surgeon can hold QSBS in a software startup. A financial advisor can hold QSBS in a restaurant chain. What matters is what the company does.
The active business test (§1202(e)(1)) also requires that at least 80% of company assets be used in a qualified trade or business during substantially all of the holding period. These two requirements interact: if the company is in an excluded field for even a portion of its activities, that portion may count against the 80% threshold.
The §1202(e)(3) excluded-industry list
The statute lists the following as not qualified trades or businesses. All are excluded as of the current law in 2026; the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA, July 2025) did not change which industries are excluded.2
A. Service fields (§1202(e)(3)(A))
Any trade or business involving the performance of services in the following fields is excluded:
| Field | Status | Common examples |
|---|---|---|
| Health | Excluded | Medical practices, dental practices, optometry, chiropractic, physical therapy, veterinary clinics |
| Law | Excluded | Law firms, solo attorney practices, legal consulting |
| Engineering | Excluded | Civil engineering firms, structural engineering, mechanical engineering consultancies |
| Architecture | Excluded | Architectural design firms, landscape architecture |
| Accounting | Excluded | CPA firms, tax preparation practices, bookkeeping services |
| Actuarial science | Excluded | Actuarial consulting practices, insurance-risk advisory firms |
| Performing arts | Excluded | Talent agencies where artist skill drives value, entertainment management businesses tied to specific performers |
| Consulting | Excluded | Management consulting, strategy consulting, HR consulting, IT consulting |
| Athletics | Excluded | Sports agencies, personal training businesses built on trainer reputation |
| Financial services | Excluded | Investment advisory firms, wealth management practices, financial planning firms |
| Brokerage services | Excluded | Securities broker-dealers, real estate brokerages, insurance brokerages |
B. The reputation-or-skill catch-all (§1202(e)(3)(A))
In addition to the named service fields, Section 1202 excludes any trade or business "where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of 1 or more of its employees."1
This provision is narrower than it sounds. Nearly every business has skilled employees. The IRS and courts have interpreted "principal asset" to mean businesses whose economic value derives primarily from personal reputation — not from products, systems, intellectual property, or processes. A company where a single founder's name or personal brand is the primary reason clients engage the firm is more likely to trigger this catch-all than a company with institutionalized products or customer bases.
C. Banking, insurance, financing, leasing, and investing (§1202(e)(3)(B))
Any trade or business involving banking, insurance, financing, leasing, investing, or "similar business" is excluded. This covers:
- Commercial and community banks, credit unions, and neobanks whose core business is deposit-taking and lending
- Insurance companies (carriers, not brokers, though brokers face the financial-services exclusion)
- Venture capital funds, hedge funds, and investment companies
- Equipment leasing and specialty finance companies
Note that the exclusion is for companies in these businesses. A software company that builds banking software, a SaaS company that adds payment processing, or a startup that holds a small investment portfolio as a cash management measure does not automatically become a "financing or investing business."
D. Farming (§1202(e)(3)(C))
Any farming business, including the raising or harvesting of trees, is excluded. Agtech companies that sell technology to farmers are in a different position than operating farms — they sell products, not farming services, and have been treated as potentially qualifying businesses.
E. Resource extraction (§1202(e)(3)(D))
Businesses involved in the production or extraction of products for which a percentage-depletion deduction is allowable (under IRC §§613 and 613A) are excluded. This covers oil and gas, coal, minerals, and certain other natural resources. Clean-energy companies (wind, solar, battery storage) are not in this category unless they also extract depletion-eligible resources.
F. Hotels, motels, and restaurants (§1202(e)(3)(E))
Businesses that operate hotels, motels, restaurants, or "similar businesses" are excluded. "Similar" has generally been interpreted to include other lodging and food-service operations. A technology company whose SaaS platform is sold to hotel operators is not "operating a hotel."
Borderline business types: how the analysis works in practice
The hardest cases arise when a company has some connection to an excluded field but is not a pure service provider in that field. Here are the most common borderline scenarios:
Healthcare technology company
| Company | Electronic health records SaaS platform sold to hospitals and medical practices |
| Does it qualify? | Likely qualifies |
| Reasoning | The company sells software — it is not "performing services in the field of health." The customers are healthcare providers; the company itself does not treat patients or bill for clinical services. The IRS Chief Counsel has recognized this distinction in several informal positions. However, if the company employs physicians to provide telehealth services or medical director oversight billed to clients, that revenue stream may be excluded and must be analyzed under the 80% active business test. |
Fintech / financial technology startup
| Company | App that automates personal budgeting and savings; does not hold user funds or provide investment advice |
| Does it qualify? | Likely qualifies |
| Reasoning | The company sells software, not financial services. It does not manage assets, execute trades, or hold licenses as a broker-dealer or investment advisor. Compare to a robo-advisor that is registered as an investment advisor and charges AUM fees — that company is more likely in the "financial services" or "investing" business and would be excluded. |
IT consulting and staffing firm
| Company | Technology staffing agency placing engineers and developers with enterprise clients on a time-and-materials basis |
| Does it qualify? | Likely excluded |
| Reasoning | The company's business is performing consulting services (placing people to provide technical services to others). "Consulting" is named in §1202(e)(3)(A). The IRS has taken the position that IT consulting falls within the consulting exclusion. Selling software products, by contrast, is not "consulting." The distinction is whether clients are paying for people's time and expertise versus a product or platform. |
Software-plus-services company
| Company | SaaS platform with 70% revenue from software licenses and 30% from professional services and implementation consulting |
| Does it qualify? | Depends on asset allocation |
| Reasoning | This is analyzed under the 80% active business test. If 70%+ of company assets are used in the qualified (software) business and the consulting activities fall below the 20% threshold, the company can satisfy the active business test and the stock may qualify. If the consulting business is larger or growing, the company may fail the 80% threshold. Asset allocation — not revenue split — is the statutory measure. |
Management consulting firm pivoting to SaaS
| Company | Former consulting firm that built a software product; at issuance, revenue was 90% consulting / 10% software |
| Does it qualify? | Excluded at issuance |
| Reasoning | The qualified-trade-or-business test must be met "during substantially all of the taxpayer's holding period." Stock issued when the company was primarily a consulting firm was issued into a disqualified business. Even if the company later pivots to 90% SaaS revenue, the original issuance facts are captured at the time of issuance. Shares issued after the business has demonstrably shifted to a qualifying model would be analyzed based on those later facts. |
Real estate startup (proptech)
| Company | Online real estate marketplace that charges listing fees; does not hold property or perform brokerage transactions |
| Does it qualify? | Likely qualifies |
| Reasoning | Operating a marketplace platform is different from being a real estate brokerage. "Brokerage services" in §1202(e)(3)(A) refers to acting as a licensed agent on behalf of buyers or sellers in transactions. A platform that charges listing fees is closer to a media or technology company. This is fact-specific — if the company employs licensed agents and earns commissions from transactions, it becomes harder to distinguish from a brokerage. |
The 80% active business test — how it interacts with excluded industries
Section 1202(e)(1) requires that at least 80% of a corporation's assets (by value) be used in the active conduct of a qualified trade or business during substantially all of the shareholder's holding period.1
This means a company can have some revenue or assets in an excluded category and still have its stock qualify — as long as the excluded activities don't exceed 20% of total assets. The statute measures assets, not revenue. A company can have a high-margin consulting line that represents 30% of revenue but only 10% of total assets (because the consulting business requires little capital) and still pass the test.
Practically:
- Cash and cash equivalents held as reasonable working capital do not fail the test, but excess cash held for investment can count against it.
- Assets used in an excluded business (equipment, receivables, IP) count against the 80% threshold.
- The test is applied during "substantially all" of the holding period — a company that passes at issuance but drifts into an excluded activity can fail years later, retroactively threatening the exclusion for stock already issued.
What OBBBA changed — and what it didn't
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (signed July 4, 2025) made significant changes to Section 1202, but none of them affected the excluded-industry list. The changes under OBBBA are:3
- Exclusion cap: raised from $10M flat to $15M per issuer for stock issued after July 4, 2025 (still $10M for earlier stock; indexed for inflation after 2026)
- Tiered holding period: 50% exclusion at 3+ years, 75% at 4+ years, 100% at 5+ years for post-July 4, 2025 stock (pre-OBBBA stock retains 100% exclusion at 5 years)
- Gross assets threshold: raised from $50M to $75M for stock issued after July 4, 2025
The §1202(e)(3) excluded-industry list is unchanged. A business excluded before OBBBA remains excluded after it.
What to do if your company is in an excluded industry
If your company's primary business is in an excluded field, your stock does not qualify for the §1202 exclusion regardless of holding period. But that's not the end of the planning conversation:
- Section 1045 is also unavailable. The §1045 rollover (defer gain by reinvesting in new QSBS within 60 days) requires that both the sold stock and the new stock qualify under §1202. If neither company is in a qualified trade or business, the rollover does not apply.
- Qualified Opportunity Zones (QOZ). A §1400Z-2 investment in a qualified opportunity fund is available regardless of what business the investor is selling. The deferral and gain exclusion mechanics are different from QSBS, but it may be relevant post-exit.
- Charitable planning. Donating appreciated stock to a donor-advised fund or charitable remainder trust before a sale can eliminate capital gains in some circumstances, and it's not conditional on QSBS status.
- State-level equivalents. Some states offer their own small business stock exclusions with different industry rules. California does not conform to §1202 at all, but other states have partial programs worth reviewing.
- Restructuring. In rare cases where a company is in transition from an excluded to a qualifying business model, new stock issued after the transition may qualify. This requires careful timing, documentation, and qualified tax counsel.
For investors who believed their stock qualified but later discover the company was in an excluded industry, a tax professional should be engaged before any transaction closes — incorrectly reporting excluded gain can result in underpayment penalties and interest.
Working with an advisor on the business eligibility question
The industry-exclusion analysis is a facts-and-circumstances inquiry, not a checkbox. Companies with ambiguous business models — software-plus-services, healthcare technology, fintech, marketplace platforms — need qualified tax counsel to document the analysis before a transaction, not after.
A fee-only financial advisor working with QSBS holders typically helps coordinate:
- Reviewing the company's QSBS attestation letter and cap table documentation
- Coordinating with the CPA and M&A attorney to verify the business-eligibility analysis before closing
- Modeling the exclusion amount and post-sale tax position based on confirmed eligibility
- Advising on the post-exit investment and charitable planning options if eligibility is in doubt
See the guide to choosing a QSBS advisor and the full qualification requirements guide for more context on what the advisor reviews and when to engage before a transaction.
Talk to a QSBS specialist advisor
If your company's business model is ambiguous or you're not sure whether your shares qualify, a specialist can coordinate the review with your CPA and M&A attorney before a transaction closes. Use the form below.
Sources
- 26 U.S.C. § 1202 — Partial exclusion for gain from certain small business stock (LII/Cornell). §1202(e)(1) (active business test); §1202(e)(3) (qualified trade or business definition and excluded-industry list). Values and structure verified as of June 2026.
- IRS Chief Counsel Advice 202418001 (April 2024) — addresses §1202 qualified trade or business analysis for a service-adjacent business.
- Grant Thornton — Explaining enhanced Section 1202 benefits (2025). Summary of OBBBA changes to the exclusion cap, tiered holding period, and gross assets threshold. Confirms excluded-industry list is unchanged.
- The Tax Adviser — QSBS gets a makeover: What tax pros need to know about Sec. 1202's new look (November 2025). Practitioner analysis of post-OBBBA QSBS planning, including unchanged qualified-trade-or-business requirements.
- ACTEC Foundation — Estate Planning Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act: QSBS (2025). Discussion of OBBBA QSBS changes from estate planning and gifting perspective.
Excluded-industry list reflects §1202(e)(3) as amended through June 2026. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (P.L. 119-21, July 4, 2025) did not amend the §1202(e)(3) excluded-industry list.